|
PROFORMA
FOR SUBMISSION OF PROPOSALS OF CROP-VARIETY TO CENTRAL SUB-COMMITTEE
ON CROP STANDARDS, NOTIFICATION AND RELEASE OF VARIETIES
| 1 |
Name of
the Crop and Species |
:
|
|
| 2 |
a) Name
of the Variety under which tested. |
:
|
|
| 3 |
Sponsored by |
:
|
|
| 4 |
a) Institution or
agency responsible for development Variety (with address).
b) Name of persons who helped in the development of variety.
|
:
|
|
| 5 |
a) Parentage with
details of its pedigree.
b) Source of material in case of introduction.
c) Breeding method
d) Breeding objective |
:
|
|
| 6 |
State the varieties
which most closely resemble the proposed variety in general
characteristics. |
:
|
|
| 7 |
a) Whether recommended
by Seminar / Conference / Workshop / State Seed Sub-Committee.
b) If so, its recommendations with specific justification for
the release of proposed variety.
c) Specific areas of its adaptation. |
:
|
|
| 8 |
Recommended production
ecology. |
:
|
|
| 9 |
Description of Variety / hybrid.
(a) Plant height
(b) Distinguishing morphological characters
(c) Maturity (range in number of days) Seeding/Transplanting
to flowering, seed to seed.
(d) Maturity group (early, medium and late-wherever such classification
exists).
(e) Reaction to major diseases under field and controlled
condition (reaction to physiological strains/races/bio-types
to be indicated wherever possible)
(f) Reactions to major pests (Under field and controlled conditions
including storage pests)
(g) Agronomic features (e.g. resistance to lodging, shattering,
fertilizer responsiveness; suitability for early or late sown
conditions, seed rate, etc.)
(h) Quality of produce of grain, forage / fibre including
nutritive value, where relevant.
(i) Reaction to stresses
|
:
|
|
| 10 |
Description of parents
of hybrid
a) Plant height
b) Distinguishing morphological characters.
c) Days to 50% flowering
d) Maturity (Rang in number of days – seed to seed).
e) Is there any problem of synchronization? If yes, methods
to overcome it.
f) Reaction to major pests (under field and controlled conditions
reaction to physiological strains/indicated wherever possible).
g) Reactions to major pests (under field and controlled conditions
including store-pests).
h) Agronomic features (e.g. resistance to lodging and shattering;
fertilizer responsiveness; seed rate etc.)
i) Reaction to stresses. |
:
|
|
| 11 |
a) Yield data in regional/
inter-regional / district trials year-wise (levels of fertilizer,
application, density of plant population and superiority over
local control / standard variety to be indicated).
b) Yield data from national demonstration/large-scale demonstration.
c) Average yield under normal conditions (yield in kgs/hectare)
|
:
|
|
| 12 |
a) Agency responsible
for maintaining breeder seed.
b) Quantity of breeder seed in stock in kgs. |
:
|
|
| 13 |
Information on the
acceptability of the variety by farmers/consumers/industry.
|
:
|
|
| 14 |
Specific recommendations,
if any, for seed production |
:
|
|
| 15 |
Any other pertinent
information. |
:
|
|
| 16 |
Vivid presentation
with the help of photographs of the variety is to be submitted
by the Breeder. |
:
|
|
PROFORMA
FOR SUBMISSION OF PROPOSALS FOR IDENTIFICATION OF CROP VARIETIES
/ HYBRIDS BY THE WORKSHOPS
| 1 |
Name of the Variety/Hybrid
Species
|
|
|
| 2 |
Parentage |
|
|
| 3 |
Developed by (Station
and names of workers) |
|
|
| 4 |
Proposed by |
|
|
| 5 |
Production condition
for which to be identified |
|
|
| 6 |
Production condition
for which to be identified |
|
|
| 7 |
In case of hybrid
description of the parents |
|
|
| 8 |
List (at least two)
important morphological features of the proposed variety/hybrid
which distinguish if from other important commercial varieties
under field condition. Also enclose separately a complete description
of the variety |
|
|
| 9 |
List main problems
and special requirements (in order of importance of the concerned
area of recommendation and how the proposed variety helps to
resolve these. |
|
|
| 10 |
List main problems
and special requirements (in order of importance of the concerned
area of recommendation and how the proposed variety helps to
resolve these. |
|
|
| 11 |
Quantity of breeder seed available
(a) Variety
(b)Parental lines in case of hybrids
|
|
|
| 12 |
Problems and prospects
in seed production of parental lines and hybrids and their maintenance
(wherever applicable) |
|
(Tables 1,2,3,4 & 5 and append centre wise data)
|
| 1 |
(a) Name of the Variety/Hybrid
(b) Species |
:
|
|
| 2 |
Parentage |
:
|
|
| 3 |
Breeding method used
|
:
|
|
| 4 |
Developed by (Station
and names of workers) |
:
|
|
| 5 |
Proposed by |
:
|
|
| 6 |
Zone for which to
be identified |
:
|
|
| 7 |
Production condition
for which to be identified |
:
|
|
| 8 |
In case of hybrid
description of the parents |
:
|
|
| 9 |
List (at least two)
important morphological features of the proposed variety/hybrid
which distinguish if from other important commercial varieties
under field condition. Also enclose separately a complete description
of the variety |
:
|
|
| 10 |
The new variety/hybrid
provides an alternative/replacement for |
:
|
|
| 11 |
List main problems
and special requirements (in order of importance of the concerned
area of recommendation and how the proposed variety helps to
resolve these. |
:
|
|
| 12 |
Year when first entered
in Coordinated Varietal Trials |
:
|
|
| 13 |
Quantity of breeder
seed available
(a) Variety
(b)Parental lines in case of hybrids |
:
|
|
| 14 |
Summary / detailed
data as per enclosures |
:
|
(Tables 1,2,3,4 & 5 and append centre wise data)
|
| 15 |
Problems and prospects
in seed production of parental lines and hybrids and their maintenance
(wherever applicable) |
:
|
|
Table 1. Summary yield data of Coordinated
Varietal Trials
Name of proposed Variety / Hybrid : ____________ Adaptability
Zone : _____________ Production condition _____________
|
|
Year of Testing
|
No. of Trials
|
Proposed Variety
|
Check Var.
1
|
Check Var.
2
|
Check Var.
3
|
Qual Var. 1
|
Qual Var. 2
|
Qual Var. 3
|
C.D.
|
| Mean yield (Q/ha)
|
1st Year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| b) Zonal |
2nd Year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| b) Across Zones (if
applicable |
3rd Year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mean |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage increase or decrease
Over the checks & qualifying
varieties
|
1st Year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2nd Yea |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3rd Year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Frequency in the top
group (pooled for 3 years) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note :
Qualifying variety is one which has completed three years of
testing in coordinated trials. Centre-wise and year-wise data must
be appended otherwise proposal will not be considered.
Table 2. Adaptability to Agronomic variables
Name of proposed Variety / Hybrid : ____________ Adaptability
Zone : _____________ Production condition _____________
|
Nature
of Expt :
|
Item
|
Proposed Variety
|
Check Var.
1
|
Check Var.
2
|
Check Var.
3
|
Qual Var. 1
|
Qual Var. 2
|
Qual Var. 3
|
| Sowing date experiments |
Yield (Q/ha) Under recommended sowing date |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Percentage
gain or loss when sown : |
i) Early
ii) Normal iii) Late |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Fertilizer experiments |
Yield (Q/ha) under recommended dose |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Percentage
gain or loss under other doses |
i) F0
ii) F1
iii)F2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Irrigation experiments (wherever applicable)
|
Yield
(Q/ha) with adequate irrigation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Percentage gain or loss with irrigation
level |
i) Level
1
ii) Level 2 iii) Level 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note :Specify each date of sowing, fertilizer
level and number of irrigations at I, ii, iii under column two.
Table 3. Reaction to major
diseases
Name of proposed Variety / Hybrid : ____________ Adaptability Zone
: _____________ Production condition _____________
|